DemonRC
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,846
- Location
- Houston, TX
If his system is viable I will not pursue the belt drive any longer. The reason we prototyped the belt drive was because we were delayed on our CVT drive. Our last revision of the belt drive was similar but we incorporated out own alloy plate. This made the system more expensive than his so we'll just run with what we like best which is the 2 speed.cordy said:Demon does this mean your belt drive is kaput? Terminated ?
Soembody ask him what kind of belt and what the materials are in this post. If it's a T5 or HTD 5M made or Neoprene and/or polyurethane **WITH a KEVLAR CORE**, it will hold up to a TS reed 30.5 no problem. We used polyurethane/kevlar on our test units. They hold up great. The advantage of polyurethane over neoprene is that it is highly wear resistant. His unit is enclosed so Neoprene is fine. Neoprene does have an advantage too. It's more chemical resistant.rcgasser said:+1 Great question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just be sure that it has a KEVLAR core. I ran out of belts at one time because we only got a few samples of the kevlar belts. So I overnighted some neoprene/fiberglass belts so I could continue running. I had 10x belts ($100 worth) and snapped all 10 within 1 hour. This was with my TS reed 30.5. The quickest I snapped one was right after I turned the car on and hit the throttle. The car jumped about 1 foot and just revved. I thought I forgot to tighten a setscrew or something untill I saw the belt was gone.